(1) the managers’ comments about the need to bring more younger workers;
(2) referring to older employees by ageist nicknames, such as “father” or “father time”.
(3) encouraging older workers to resign;
(4) criticizing an older employee’s performing in a way that would suggest that age is a factor in that criticism. For instance, statements like “you are becoming slow; you are not the same as you used to be a few years ago” can be perceived as a ageist remark that can be used against the employer in court.
(5) a patter of laying older workers off due to “lay offs” or “slow-down” to only hire younger employees a short period of time later, due to “growth”
(6) setting mandatory retirement age policy, which in most cases is per se illegal.
Because for obvious reasons employers almost never admit to terminating their employees due to their age, small bits and pieces of evidence of possibly discriminatory motive can be critical in proving age discrimination in court, at arbitration or any other legal or administrative proceeding.